On 09/07/2011 12:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Genes MailLists<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 09/07/2011 09:57 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> >>> >>> %changelog isn't for developers. It's for users to see what the >>> developers changed in the package. >>> >> >> Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ? Assuming appropriate >> comments are required for fedora's git repo. > > No... users can access %changelog for the RPMs on their system via > rpm. Making them go to a git repository elsewhere to figure out what > changed isn't exactly friendly. > > Unless of course you meant "have fedpkg automatically stick a > git-shortlog into the %changelog section of the spec file on commit" > or something. Then.. maybe. The installer team has been doing this for anaconda for a while now. The RPM changelog block is automatically generated for us when we make a new release. When we do a "make release", this script (among other things) is run: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=blob_plain;f=scripts/makebumpver;hb=HEAD And we have a commit log format we follow: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=blob_plain;f=docs/commit-log.txt;hb=HEAD It works well for us. > And yes, this assumes in all cases that developers are actually > putting useful information in both %changelog and commit logs. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
