On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug that > can be easily reproduced. I note that this is fixed in -7: thanks. However, checking how it was fixed was rather painful... http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d05dd8538a552f4b4831d073eb11ff694d99419f ...since it seems like all Fedora patching of glibc is done in a single giant patch, and that patch gets a ton of changes with every update, as the whole thing is rediffed. Is there a specific reason glibc does this? Can it not have a set of patches, one per change, as is usual practice? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
