Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:38:46AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Fedora glibc sources are from git, and the bit diff is just generated
> > diff between the upstream snapshot and corresponding Fedora snapshot,
> > sans a few Fedora-only directories (which are packaged as extra tarball).
> 
> That's not a reason.
> 
> Why not keep the Fedora branch in git and make patches from it:
> 
> https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/nice-rpm-git-patch-management-trick/
> 
> This method is quite probably simpler than the one you're using now.

glibc is doing it that way for many years, even when it was diffing upstream
CVS trunk vs. Fedora CVS branch, not sure if the Fedora changes from CVS era
would result in something reasonable with your tricks, but moreover what
glibc does now is fully scripted in the Makefiles and it would be extra work
to change it to something different.  I'd say it is up to the Fedora glibc
maintainer to do it the way he prefers to (which is not me for a couple of
years now).

	Jakub
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux