Re: To Require or not to Require?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Your whole argument is just void.  There is not a single difference
> > between "external" packages and (sub-)packages.
> There is one difference: with subpackages it is trivial to write a
> Requires: that 1) is always strict enough and 2) is always satisfied.
> For external packages achieving both requires non-trivial human
> effort.

Not at all. The simplest thing to do is to ensure that any binary 
depends on at least the version of any libraries it was linked against, 
which is the way Debian handle this in the absence of maintainer 
overrides.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux