On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:30:46 +0200, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The separate "bar" package still is entirely irrelevant > > It kills your entire argument. > > Andreas. It still doesn't. libfoo update would need to come first. First come, first served. And what packaging techniques to apply in the libfoo update has been the topic of this thread: | I have a package (keyutils) that produces three RPMs: keyutils | (programs), keyutils-libs and keyutils-devel. | | ... | | So does the keyutils rpm need an explicit Requires on the keyutils-libs | rpm in the specfile or is the implicit library dependency sufficient? Whether any other update built against libfoo would also benefit from an explicit dep is covered by the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/152426 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
