On 08/11/2011 01:19 PM, David Howells wrote: > I have a package (keyutils) that produces three RPMs: keyutils (programs), > keyutils-libs and keyutils-devel. The programs in the keyutils RPM depend on > the libraries in the keyutils-libs RPM and pick up implicit dependencies thus: > > warthog>rpm -qRp keyutils-1.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm > ... > config(keyutils) = 1.5.1-1.fc14 > ... > libkeyutils.so.1()(64bit) > libkeyutils.so.1(KEYUTILS_0.3)(64bit) > libkeyutils.so.1(KEYUTILS_1.0)(64bit) > libkeyutils.so.1(KEYUTILS_1.3)(64bit) > libkeyutils.so.1(KEYUTILS_1.4)(64bit) > ... > > So does the keyutils rpm need an explicit Requires on the keyutils-libs rpm in > the specfile or is the implicit library dependency sufficient? Library requirements should be implicit unless there's a good reason otherwise; see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > rpmlint does not complain, but, for RHEL, rpmdiff does. What is the rpmdiff "complaint"? Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
