Re: BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 16:48 +0000, JB wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves <bmr <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > 
> > On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
> > > Now just a loud thinking ...
> > > Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS and
> > > some extra preinstalled software like VirtualBox etc just for testing ?
> > 
> > What, you mean like the live and non-live Fedora ISOs that have had btrfs
> > support available as an option during install since Fedora 11 (mid 2009ish)?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bryn.
> 
> Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and related utils,
> so that the testing would be more up-to-date and meaningful.

We make nightly live CDs with the latest btrfs and related utils.
They're right here.

http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux