Re: BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck.  I'm
>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
>> slow going process.
> 
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17

+1

bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
existing and over a long time well working things - never!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux