Am 13.07.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > Farkas Levente wrote: >> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready >> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17. > > If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no > reason to slip it one release there are many reasons! replacing an essential part of the OS as filesystems are with finally not well tested piece of new software is simply a dangerous game with no benefit "hopefully stable at release" is my definition of untested the normal users have not enough knowledge to chagnge the defaults and they are primary for them and advanced users which konwig what they do can select it on install time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
