Re: BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Farkas Levente wrote:
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.

If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no 
reason to slip it one release.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux