Re: BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:36 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 12:31 PM, JB wrote:
> > OK.
> >
> > Post every week on user, testers, and devel lists:
> > - BTRFS testing reminder
> > - BTRFS info (short notes; entries; pointers to any info, info/man pages)
> > - test instructions
> > - a link where to obtain latest Fedora snapshot/nightly live composes with
> >    latest BTRFS software
> >
> > Test instructions:
> >
> > Prepare a text with your wishes (what aspects of OS and BTRFS do you
> > want to be tested in particular this week), and a test plan to guide people
> > how to achieve the test goals.
> >
> > If you are interested in test results or capturing a special trace or dump,
> > write it down with clear instructions how to do it and where to file it back
> > to you.
> 
> If you're that concerned about the quality of Fedora 16 then I would 
> suggest you join the test list, become a proventester, and attend QA 
> meetings.

And help the members of the QA group who are already working to prepare
btrfs test cases - there's some discussion at
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/209 .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux