Re: BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Genes MailLists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 10:17 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> On 07/14/2011 02:54 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Genes MailLists<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
>>>> dont think we want to have raid on top of btrfs ... right?
>>>>
>>>>   Ric - what is the current status of RAID-5 ?
>>> This requires some other big changes that are disk format changes.  It
>>> seems like the big block support will go into 3.1, so after that it
>>> should be relatively shortly after that, possibly 3.2 or 3.3.  Thanks,
>>>
>>> Josef
>>
>> And just to add in here, you can run btrfs on top of MD devices although that is
>> not the most popular thing to do currently.
>>
>> Ric
>>
>
>  Thanks Josef/Ric -
>
>  Another (Q) - once the format changes, will there be tools to change
> the online format of existing filesystems - or will we need to delete
> and start fresh ?
>

All format changes happen automatically (usually with a mount option
so as not to surprise users) online so there's nothing that needs to
be done beyond giving the special mount option.  Thanks,

Josef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux