On 07/14/2011 01:07 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Reindl Harald<h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 13.07.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: >>> Farkas Levente wrote: <snip> >>> That's not the case at all, I'm not sure where you are getting that. >>> If we don't have a released offline fsck by Alpha, which IIRC is the >>> beginning of August we're not even going to make the switch. We >>> aren't aiming for "hopefully stable", we're aiming for actually >>> stable and reasonably safe. If we don't meet certain basic >>> requirements no switch will be made and everything will carry on as >>> normal. I'm not trying to shove Btrfs down peoples throats. The last >>> thing I want is to switch over to Btrfs before it's fully ready for >>> everybody to be using it, which is why there are a bunch of >>> requirements that need to be met before the switch is actually met. >>> Thanks, What was the reason we did not drop lvm altogether and went for a full btrfs only partitioning scheme as the default? JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
