Am 11.07.2011 13:11, schrieb Florian Müllner: > 2011/7/11 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > my main critic on systemd shipped als default with F15 is that > widely used services like NFS are not converted to systemd > BEFORE systemd replaced upstart > > Given that Fedora only used upstart with existing SysV scripts, upstart should not have > been included in the first place according to that argument. Yet you want to stick with > an init system which does not have a single native service, because some services are > used through systemd's SysV compatibility? Sorry, but that's hardly a credible > position, it just makes you look biased against systemd why does no one understand me here? the problem i see is that systemd is pushed with a stable update while this time are open discussions how getting important services work native with systemd this are things that should have been worked out BEFORE systemd was pushed to a stable release to get a much better overview if things working as expected, finding bugs and maybe needed improvements in systemd and AFTER that systemd AND the with fedora shipped services pushing to a GA release what happened is "we are replacing the old init-system and after that we take a look if all pakcage-maintainers can live with the new one" the qualitiy of a software intended to replace long time working things is much better if all this things are tested instead release/push and HOPE that sometimes later all works
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
