Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:33:35PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 01:49 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >The suggestion isn't that having the options is wrong, it's that having
> >them as the primary means of configuration is poor design. If your
> >entire configuration takes the form of a shell script that constructs a
> >set of command line options then you've increased fragility for no
> >benefit. Having a proper configuration file and allowing admins to
> >override specific aspects of that from the command line isn't a problem.
> >
> This is just your opinion - where in the else it this mantra preached.

These scripts don't sanitise input beforehand. What happens if I'm 
logged in as root, change IFS and then do /etc/init.d/nfs restart? Using 
shell scripts for this is just a bad idea.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux