RE: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Petrus de Calguarium
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?
> 
> Tom Hughes wrote:
> 
> > Did you upgrade this machine from an earlier version of Fedora? If so
> > then I suspect the old names will stick because you will have udev
> > persistent naming rules for them.
> 
> No, I did a clean install. I installed a week before the first Test
> Candidate for the first Release Candidate of the Alpha for Fedora 15
> came out.

Can you create a BZ with the following output.. ?

sudo /sbin/biosdevname -d
sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode
sudo /usr/sbin/biosdecode
lspci -tv
> >
> > Check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and I bet you have
> rules
> > that are forcing the ethX names.
> 
> Yes, this file is present.
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux