Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/07/11 17:02, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

> I ran the script, output:
>
> Checking hardware requirements                             [  OK  ]
> Checking for SMBIOS type 41 support                        [FAILED]
> Checking for SMBIOS type 9 support                         [  OK  ]
> Checking for PCI Interrupt Routing support                 [  OK  ]
>
> The instructions say:
>
> "If the output of the script is [ OK ] and any of the following checks
> is [ OK ], your hardware is supported by biosdevname".
>
> So, what's wrong?

Did you upgrade this machine from an earlier version of Fedora? If so 
then I suspect the old names will stick because you will have udev 
persistent naming rules for them.

Check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and I bet you have rules 
that are forcing the ethX names.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux