Re: Development only package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on making a package of OpenImageIO[1] which is used by a
> new branch of blender, blender-cycles[2], which uses the cycles
> rendering engine[3].
> 
> There appears to be one bundled library, pugixml[4] but it's only 3
> files (1 c, and 2 header files) and doesn't not compile on it's own.
> It looks to be designed intentionally to be built in to other
> programs.
> 
The tarball (I actually downloaded the zip but I hope that upstream made the
tarball contain identical files :-)  seems to compile fine on its own:

cd scripts
cmake CMakeLists.txt
make
ls -al libpugixml.a
-rw-rw-r--. 1 badger badger 342992 Jul  8 09:42 libpugixml.a

> Should I package it as "pugixml-devel" only? Or just "pugixml"?
> 
Since only static libraries are created you should be able to use these
guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpH6KyNeUjlX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux