On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm working on making a package of OpenImageIO[1] which is used by a >> new branch of blender, blender-cycles[2], which uses the cycles >> rendering engine[3]. >> >> There appears to be one bundled library, pugixml[4] but it's only 3 >> files (1 c, and 2 header files) and doesn't not compile on it's own. >> It looks to be designed intentionally to be built in to other >> programs. >> > The tarball (I actually downloaded the zip but I hope that upstream made the > tarball contain identical files :-) seems to compile fine on its own: > > cd scripts > cmake CMakeLists.txt > make > ls -al libpugixml.a > -rw-rw-r--. 1 badger badger 342992 Jul 8 09:42 libpugixml.a > What about the case where the upstream tarball is not directly capable of generating a dynamic or static library? This is the situation for a review that I am doing [1]. vmpk bundles the rtmidi [2], but rtmidi is not available as an independent library. It consists of 1 source and 2 header files and is designed to be bundled in other software. Is it okay to bundle rtmidi in our vmpk package? Thanks, Orcan [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710917 [2] http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~gary/rtmidi/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
