On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:48:14PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 12:20 +0200, Henrik Wejdmark wrote: > > > > Since you recommend not using the application menu, in other words, > > > > you agree that the application menu is useless? > > > > > > > > > > It is useful when you are looking for something and you don't know what > > > exactly it is. In that case, it is much much better then the previous > > menus, > > > because you have nice overview on one page and moreover you have the > > > possibility to filter by groups for example. > > > > On my desktop it's not on "one" page, it's a mile long listing so you get no > > overview at all. In Gnome2 at least all the apps are categorized. If the > > graphical user interface _requires_ you to use the keyboard to type the > > command > > It doesn't require you to type the command. > > You can search for "bro" and among the results will be Nautilus and > Firefox (hint: Gnome Shell also searches in the application description, > and both are "bro"wsers). I can't believe real usability testing was done on the final version of GNOME 3. I keep hearing about all these completely undiscoverable keyboard shortcuts that appear to be necessary to use GNOME 3 with any sort of effectiveness. When I struggled with GNOME 3 for about a week I didn't discover or use any keyboard shortcuts. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
