Re: SYSTEMD: Give us a option for upstart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.06.2011 09:25, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> Stop the profanities and insults, or stop posting to this mailing
> list.

sorry but for a answer like below form Kevin Kofler i have no other
words as "idiot", really! where is defined taht it is invalid
and why only for systemd if it is so well designed and production
ready like some cowboys are thinking which decides for the rest
of the users too?

it is ALPHA software and some are not realizing that we are not
speaking about a sound-daemon stopping you hear music

we are speaking about the most important component of the system!


Am 13.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> >> Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug
>> >> gave me shivers. Are we really sure that systemd is ready? I mean, I
>> >> don't even call my code "alpha" if it can't parse a slash correctly.
> >
> > How is it systemd's fault that the user's fstab is invalid?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux