On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:21:04PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > If they're used to plan9, they'll presumably want these in their path. > > > If they're in their path, other utilities are going to misbehave in ways > > > that will be difficult to debug. Why would someone choose to have a > > > broken system? > > > > Oh cmon, Matthew, you can't be serious. > > > > just s/broken/development/ in your above statement and it is obvious. > > > > people want broken things b/c then they can fix them. > > If I get a bug complaining that something doesn't work because the user > is using plan9 awk rather than gnu awk, they're going to get very firmly > NOTABUGged. I hardly think I'm alone here. > I think that's completely appropriate. But does that mean the pkg should stay out of the distro? -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
