On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:42:02PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > > > > > ones that exist in Fedora already? > > > > > > > > They come from an environment where plan9 is more commonly used and want > > > > to preserve the behaviors they know/like? > > > > > > Putting them in your path's just going to break things. > > > > > > > 'just going to break things' is the criteria, now? > > If they're used to plan9, they'll presumably want these in their path. > If they're in their path, other utilities are going to misbehave in ways > that will be difficult to debug. Why would someone choose to have a > broken system? Oh cmon, Matthew, you can't be serious. just s/broken/development/ in your above statement and it is obvious. people want broken things b/c then they can fix them. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
