On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > The question is - why does having incompatible plan9 implementations of > > > common commands make Fedora 'better', outside of "having more stuff"? > > > > > > > You could say the same about most of Fedora packages. > > > > 'Better', giving people tools to use, to choose from. Fedora isn't one of those > > pure, minimalist distributions anyway. We have a lot of alternatives for a lot > > of stuff. Some do more, some do less, some do the same but differently. > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > ones that exist in Fedora already? They come from an environment where plan9 is more commonly used and want to preserve the behaviors they know/like? -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
