On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:35, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common >> binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic >> env variables to define their root for scripts and >> symlinks/wrappers/alternatives in /usr/bin > > > In this case, though, there wouldn't be wrappers or scripts in /usr/bin. Ok looking at how convoluted we are having to get this package in.. what are the reasons to have it in Fedora? Would some other way of producing them having them available be there? Who is going to benefit from them being there? Etc -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
