2011/4/6 Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since >> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't >> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too. > > It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again > later in the cycle, probably for 1.48. ÂI see that nothing has been > rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel > and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0. ÂThe changes between 1.46.0 and > 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my > opinion, but rawhide has seen worse. ÂThat way boost users shouldn't > have to rebuild twice. I personnally have a bad experience about reverting ABI version name against upstream, specially in the case of DirectFB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673842 The best is to continue to try to educate upstream about this problem, specially if this update 'sounds like' a bugfix update. I would be more in favour to have a dedicated dist-tag used for the rebuilt of dependent packages (done preliminary in rawhide) and not to create a SONAME deviating from upstream. Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
