Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:21:23 -0500
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?
  - From: Petr Machata

Prev by Date: Re: Proven testers for Lua update
Next by Date: rawhide report: 20110406 changes
Previous by thread: GSoC proposal: KDE Plasma Dependency Generation and PackageKit Integration
Next by thread: Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux