Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.

It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
have to rebuild twice.

PM
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux