Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Machata wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>   
>> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
>> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
>> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
>>     
>
> It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
> later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
> rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
> and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
> 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
> opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
> have to rebuild twice.
>
> PM
>   
Except I just rebuilt ogre a few days ago, because though it had been 
rebuild for 1.46.1, it got 1.46.0.

-J

-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux