On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:13 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/14/11 1:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0100, jan.klepek wrote: > > > > > In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is > > > currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about > > > packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already "old" powertop. > > > So I will have to package it as powertop2 because it is completely > > > different tool. > > > Does it have sense to package it as powertop2? Or should rather powertop > > > package maintainer update powertop package with new sources (even when > > > they are considered as alpha)? > > > > Is powertop1 going to continue to be updated ? I would assume not, > > and having both in the archive is just going to cause confusion. > > > > What's wrong with waiting for the non-alpha version, and then updating > > the existing powertop package ? > > > > Dave > > > > Er, isn't it already built for fedora? I think the migration > is well in hand. :) > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/powertop/1.97/ > > -Eric Good to know, I somehow missed this in powertop fedora git :( Thanks for info Eric. Regards, Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
