Hi, In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already "old" powertop. So I will have to package it as powertop2 because it is completely different tool. Does it have sense to package it as powertop2? Or should rather powertop package maintainer update powertop package with new sources (even when they are considered as alpha)? As both tools have same binary name, localization file and manpage, should be source code updated and all occurence of word "powertop" replaced with word "powertop2"? Or how this situation should be handled? [1] http://blog.fenrus.org/?p=80 Regards, Jan Klepek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
