On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0100, jan.klepek wrote: > In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is > currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about > packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already "old" powertop. > So I will have to package it as powertop2 because it is completely > different tool. > Does it have sense to package it as powertop2? Or should rather powertop > package maintainer update powertop package with new sources (even when > they are considered as alpha)? Is powertop1 going to continue to be updated ? I would assume not, and having both in the archive is just going to cause confusion. What's wrong with waiting for the non-alpha version, and then updating the existing powertop package ? Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
