On 3/14/11 1:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0100, jan.klepek wrote: > > > In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is > > currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about > > packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already "old" powertop. > > So I will have to package it as powertop2 because it is completely > > different tool. > > Does it have sense to package it as powertop2? Or should rather powertop > > package maintainer update powertop package with new sources (even when > > they are considered as alpha)? > > Is powertop1 going to continue to be updated ? I would assume not, > and having both in the archive is just going to cause confusion. > > What's wrong with waiting for the non-alpha version, and then updating > the existing powertop package ? > > Dave > Er, isn't it already built for fedora? I think the migration is well in hand. :) http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/powertop/1.97/ -Eric -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
