On 12/09/2010 08:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:53 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: >>>> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>>>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make >>>>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once >>>>> (or some other threshold):) >>>> >>>> Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented? >>> >>> and bugs where an app just very obviously crashes on start. I know *I* >>> wouldn't try it again in that case. What would be the point? I'd know it >>> was going to crash. >> >> Well, I would definitely run it again after saying "WTH, did it really >> just crash on startup?" :) > > if it just invisibly doesn't run, I'd try it again, but if I'm running > it from the console and it spits out a clear fatal error and crashes, > yeah, I'm not going to run it again. That'd be pointless. - but sometimes the star constellation changes and somwhere some butterfly waves it's wings and the program might start working again ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
