Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:53 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
> >>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
> >>> (or some other threshold):)
> >>
> >> Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented?
> >
> > and bugs where an app just very obviously crashes on start. I know *I*
> > wouldn't try it again in that case. What would be the point? I'd know it
> > was going to crash.
> 
> Well, I would definitely run it again after saying "WTH, did it really 
> just crash on startup?" :)

if it just invisibly doesn't run, I'd try it again, but if I'm running
it from the console and it spits out a clear fatal error and crashes,
yeah, I'm not going to run it again. That'd be pointless.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux