On 11/9/10 8:23 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > I've seen the responses on the Wayland list, and it's always "Wayland > isn't intended to do that." So, there's no point raising objections > there. > > The risk is that Wayland gets developed and a bunch of key > applications in Fedora get broken. The Wayland guys are not the > people to talk to, since network transparency isn't on their radar, > from what I can see. What makes you think that carping about it here will have any effect, particularly because NOBODY HAS PROPOSED WE USE WAYLAND yet. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
