On 11/9/10 7:23 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > At which point, it's too late. Unless Server-y people point out that > things like network apps actually matter, the default path may be to do > what will look nice on a local desktop (for the record, I can see full > screen tearing-free graphics both using upstream Intel and upstream ATI > drivers - one on a laptop, one dual headed desktop - just fine already). > > Like Rich, I enjoy being able to start e.g. rawhide apps running on a > virtual machine and have them render to my local X server, or start a > second X and have an entire gnome-session running from a rawhide "box" > sitting on my virt server. Also, although there are other ways to do it, > my typical use of virt-manager these days is by forwarded X over ssh. Perhaps you should take your concerns to a mailing list the Wayland developers actually read and participate on. Banging on about it here, when nobody in Fedora has actually suggested we make use of Wayland, seems like a big waste of everybody's time. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
