Peter Jones wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 10:08 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
>> On 10/6/10, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I won't comment on the trademark issue (because that's just pure
>>> lunacy), but let me comment here "they don't accept my patches, so they
>>> are non- free". That's just nonsense ...
>>
>> Yes it is, that's not the issue. They aren't letting us distribute it
>> ourselves, unless its brand is removed or we don't make those changes.
>
> On the contrary, distribution is the thing they *are* allowing.
He's talking about distribution WITH THE PATCHES THEY REJECTED (something
pretty much ANY other upstream allows, even if they often frown upon it to
some extent). So you're missing the point.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
