On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > > "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to > > > make differences. > > > > ...snip... > > > > I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a > > security or bugfix only update, right? > > IMHO it depends on what kind of software it is. > > I push releases of applications to all current Fedora releases. The > users want the new features, it's what they have been bugging me for. > > If I was working on glibc or X I might not do that, but applications > should be pushed back unless there is some system level constraint > preventing it. > > So I too would like a "commit to all branches" or "sync all branches > to this one" command. If it doesn't change the user experience, and fixes bugs or security issues, then great. ;) If it's a major update which does change the user experience, breaks ABI/API, or adds a bunch of new functionality, then please don't. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
