11.10.2010 21:26, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 > Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 >>> "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to >>>> make differences. >>> ...snip... >>> >>> I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a >>> security or bugfix only update, right? >> IMHO it depends on what kind of software it is. >> >> I push releases of applications to all current Fedora releases. The >> users want the new features, it's what they have been bugging me for. >> >> If I was working on glibc or X I might not do that, but applications >> should be pushed back unless there is some system level constraint >> preventing it. >> >> So I too would like a "commit to all branches" or "sync all branches >> to this one" command. > If it doesn't change the user experience, and fixes bugs or security > issues, then great. ;) If it's a major update which does change the > user experience, breaks ABI/API, or adds a bunch of new functionality, > then please don't. > > kevin Off course. I really did not want start again this flame war. Off course I also have packages where branches does not synced. I only ask how I can accomplish such task where it possible. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev aka Pahan-Hubbitus. For fast contact with me you could use Jabber: Hubbitus@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
