On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to > > make differences. > > ...snip... > > I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a security > or bugfix only update, right? IMHO it depends on what kind of software it is. I push releases of applications to all current Fedora releases. The users want the new features, it's what they have been bugging me for. If I was working on glibc or X I might not do that, but applications should be pushed back unless there is some system level constraint preventing it. So I too would like a "commit to all branches" or "sync all branches to this one" command. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
