Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Clasen (mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of
> > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority
> > features from falling apart is leaving you no time to polish the user
> > experience for the large majority of users.
> 
> Correct. And any time it's suggested that certain parts of that crap
> be removed to streamline things, people come screaming. (The discussion
> about pruning the install methods is the one that comes to mind...
> mm, nfsiso and hard drive installs.)

The permutations are exhaustive.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2010-May/msg00305.html

Thanks,
James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux