On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/04/2010 06:50 PM, Florent Le Coz wrote: >> On 04/10/10 14:52, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> Trademark cannot be ever free as in freedom. >> That's why Fedora should not ship Firefox, but Iceweasel, or Icecat, or >> Minefield, or anything else that is not trademarked and isn't impossible >> to patch without mozilla's consent. > > Ignoring upstream and patching without consent is only feasible if you > have the amount of resources to do a good job with that. Fedora doesn't > have that. > > Rahul > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora shouldn't include software it doesn't have the resources to maintain. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
