Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/31/2010 12:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:05, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It depends on whether Fedora is a platform for development.  If it is,
>> developers usually do not want many changes.
>>
> 
> It depends on the type of developer and what they are doing. Trying to
> lump all the developers into one bottle is one of the problems of this
> so-called conversation.
> 
> 
> 

   I concur - I know some who are happy with things staying as they were
in 1980.

   I know more who prefer reasonably current toolkits - many get
frustrated when obligated to work on older installs (the 'stable' but
somewhat ancient ones in particular)  which may have packages a few
years older than current.


    And its not just kernels, libraries and compilers but applications
too. (e.g TeXlive without biblatex, openoffice without docx etc etc).


   gene/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux