-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/24/10 1:46 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:32 +0200, drago01 wrote: >> [...] In the event that F14 goes back >>> to upstart, the final release will use a configuration that may not have >>> received much testing. If we want to claim that it's safe to switch >>> back to upstart after beta, we need to be testing that configuration >>> now, along with the systemd configuration. >> >> Well that wouldn't be a systemd issue but a flaw in our feature process. >> We have Feature foo with rollback plan to go back to bar. >> >> We decide to revert foo due to bug X, Y and Z and we and up with foo >> after beta ... > > It is a potential problem with all features, but more so for replacing > the init system because the stakes are higher and the amount of testing > required is greater. > > The "contingency plans" on most of the feature pages seem to state only > what the rolled-back configuration is, not how it will be tested. > Sounds like good feedback for the feature wrangler and for FESCo as far as what they might require in contingency plan sections. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx0NaQACgkQ4v2HLvE71NU4hwCeLgkcqmTO1WOwPz35eLe+2tH2 WcEAoMQ4UoZw/rUAJERvuXCiko57vUzZ =V2ZI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
