On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:14 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: >> >> > > The intent is not to do so in the final release, AIUI. We're only >> > > keeping it around during pre-release, so that if we decide we need to >> > > fall back to upstart for final release, it's easy to do. As far as I >> > > know, the plan is to decide later (presumably after beta) which one >> > > we're going with, and dump the other. >> > > >> > >> > So the alpha and beta will be tested in a configuration that the final >> > release will not? >> >> Hmm, I'd say 'not really, no' (unless we decide to fall back to >> upstart) > > I think that's precisely the concern. In the event that F14 goes back > to upstart, the final release will use a configuration that may not have > received much testing. If we want to claim that it's safe to switch > back to upstart after beta, we need to be testing that configuration > now, along with the systemd configuration. Well that wouldn't be a systemd issue but a flaw in our feature process. We have Feature foo with rollback plan to go back to bar. We decide to revert foo due to bug X, Y and Z and we and up with foo after beta ... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
