Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > GENERAL SANITY
> > > - Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart:
> > > -- The same set of services will be started.
> > 
> > I don't think this is a requirement on systemd, really. If we make
> > changes to the default system configuration to not include a service in
> > F14 that was included in F13, that is not a systemd problem. So, I think
> > what you really mean here is: systemd will start all services that are
> > configured to be included in the default install (and dependencies), but
> > no others.
> 
> If we're still including upstart as a fallback option, I think it's

The intent is not to do so in the final release, AIUI. We're only
keeping it around during pre-release, so that if we decide we need to
fall back to upstart for final release, it's easy to do. As far as I
know, the plan is to decide later (presumably after beta) which one
we're going with, and dump the other.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux