On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 18:26, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote: [...] > > > Again, I'm sorry. Maybe it makes you feel better to know that I am > > > feeling the same pain as you, but not for an individual package, but for > > > all of GNOME... > > > > I understand. I don't mind the extra work due to the breakage, just the > > fact that it wasn't clearly announced for such a big change. Some good > > came out of it, too, so let's just strive to do better next time. > > The fedora-desktop list is usually where we discuss this, and we > "announced" this in the "GTK+3 advisiblity for F14?" thread, after the > upstream announcements were made (which I guess were pretty well > publicised). That's great, but I'm maintaining just one little application that is affected. IMO ABI changes (even those affecting a handful of packages) should be announced in devel@ and not require subscribing to additional mailing-lists. I see plenty of people announcing ABI breakage (boost, for a recent example). Why can't you? > If in any doubts, hop on #fedora-desktop on GIMPNet, and I'm sure > there'll be people to infirm or confirm your suspicions in the future. It's not on FreeNode and I can't find any information about SSL/TLS support on irc.gnome.org. I can't connect using unencrypted connection. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
