On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 16:24 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Dear GNOME maintainers, > > > I would appreciate it if you announced changes that cause broken > > > dependencies. > > > > Ah, so you admit to not reading FESCo summaries :-). > > Yes. There's too much traffic on devel@. I did check devel-announce again > in case I missed anything before sending this e-mail. Besides, FESCo > meeting summary only states that the feature was accepted. Or were you > expecting me to read the entire meeting log? ;) > > There was literally nothing about the fall-out of this transition > on devel@ at all. At least I couldn't find anything relevant searching > for "gnome" and "gtk". > > [...] > > Again, I'm sorry. Maybe it makes you feel better to know that I am > > feeling the same pain as you, but not for an individual package, but for > > all of GNOME... > > I understand. I don't mind the extra work due to the breakage, just the > fact that it wasn't clearly announced for such a big change. Some good > came out of it, too, so let's just strive to do better next time. The fedora-desktop list is usually where we discuss this, and we "announced" this in the "GTK+3 advisiblity for F14?" thread, after the upstream announcements were made (which I guess were pretty well publicised). If in any doubts, hop on #fedora-desktop on GIMPNet, and I'm sure there'll be people to infirm or confirm your suspicions in the future. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
