Re: The slip down memory lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 13:39 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:

> Would an 8[1] month cycle cause fewer slips per release?  Fewer bugs?

Personally, I'd like to see a 9-12 month cycle. Much as I'm sure
everyone out there instantly upgrades every system the moment a new
release comes out, and doesn't mind a year of overall updates, something
- just something - suggests to me that this might, not, quite be
true...I'd love it if we'd actually ask our users what they want.

Jon.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux